Most hotel tech companies that look closely at their funnel find more than one leak. Two of the most common sit on either side of the signature: conversion, where qualified deals are lost between the demo and the contract, and activation, where signed properties fail to reach regular use in their first months.

Both cost revenue. Both are fixable. But small teams can rarely fix both at once, so the order matters. Choose wrong and you can spend a quarter improving one number while the other quietly cancels out the gain.

Why the order matters

Conversion and activation are linked. Better conversion brings more properties into onboarding. If onboarding is leaky, many of those new properties will never become healthy, paying customers. You will have won more deals and lost most of the extra revenue a few months later, often with added support costs and a few unhappy references along the way.

The reverse is less painful. Fixing activation first improves the value of every deal you already win. Revenue from existing sales goes up, early churn goes down, and when you later improve conversion, the extra deals land in an onboarding process that can hold them.

That is why, in most cases, activation comes first. But not always.

When activation should come first

Start with activation if a meaningful share of new properties struggle in their first ninety days. The signs are familiar: properties that never move off their old system completely, front desk staff who fall back to spreadsheets, repeated support tickets about basic setup, and cancellations or downgrades before the first renewal. We cover the full pattern in the signs of a hotel tech activation problem.

Activation should also come first when your reputation depends heavily on word of mouth, which in hospitality it usually does. A poorly onboarded property tells other general managers. Every extra deal you win before fixing activation is a risk to the references you need for the next ten.

When conversion should come first

Conversion comes first when activation is already healthy. If most new properties are live, using the product and renewing, the constraint is not what happens after signature. It is how many deals reach it.

Conversion also comes first when the pipeline is so thin that the company cannot fund itself long enough to fix activation properly. In that case, a quicker improvement to demo and proposal conversion may be needed to buy time. Treat this as a deliberate short-term choice, with activation as the next fix, not as a reason to ignore it.

Use the data you already have

The decision should rest on numbers, even rough ones. Pull two sets.

For conversion, look at the last two or three quarters of qualified opportunities and count how many reached a signed contract. Note where the rest were lost: after the demo, after the proposal, or in procurement. For activation, define what an active property means for your product, such as daily logins by front desk staff or a first stay processed end to end, and count what share of new properties hit it within their first thirty and ninety days.

Then put a rough revenue figure against each leak. How much would a realistic improvement in conversion add? How much revenue is lost to properties that churn or downgrade because they never activated? The leak with the larger, more certain figure usually goes first. This is the same logic behind mapping where revenue leaks in hotel tech, applied to a single decision.

Do not run both unless you can staff both

It is tempting to fix both at once. A larger team with a clear owner for each fix, separate leading indicators and the discipline to review them weekly can sometimes manage it. Most hotel tech companies below a few million in revenue cannot.

Running both at once splits the attention of the same few people. It also muddies the data. If revenue improves, you will not know which change caused it, and if it does not, you will not know which one to adjust. Sequence the fixes, measure each against a clean baseline, and give the first one time to settle, as covered in what to do in the quarter after a GTM fix.

Consider a spa booking vendor

Picture a hypothetical spa and wellness booking vendor selling to resort hotels. Leadership believes the problem is conversion: demos go well, but too many deals stall at proposal. The plan is to rebuild the proposal and tighten follow-up.

Before starting, the team pulls activation data for the last two cohorts. Roughly a third of new resorts are still running parts of their spa diary on paper after ninety days. Several of those are asking about cancellation terms. The revenue at risk from those properties is larger than the likely gain from better proposals.

The vendor switches the order. It rebuilds onboarding around the spa manager's first week, with a guided setup and a check-in call after the first busy weekend. Once the next cohort shows most resorts fully live within a month, it turns to the proposal. The conversion fix now feeds an onboarding process that keeps what it wins.

Make the call, then commit

The choice between conversion and activation is rarely obvious from gut feel. Founders tend to favour whichever leak they can see most clearly, which is usually conversion because it shows up in the pipeline meeting. Activation losses are quieter and arrive later.

Let the numbers decide, fix one thing properly, and then move to the next with a clean baseline. If you want an outside view of which leak is costing you more, the 12-point leak audit takes about twenty minutes and gives you a first ranking of where revenue is escaping.

Frequently Asked Questions