A general manager likes the demo and asks one question before anything else: can we do this month to month? The founder wants annual, because annual means predictable revenue, cleaner forecasts and a better story for investors. The rep wants whichever closes this quarter. Each of them is partly right, and the contract term you default to shapes your pipeline, your churn and your cash for years.
This decision has real data behind it. Below is what billing research across thousands of software companies shows, what hotel software vendors publish about their terms, the pros and cons of each option, and which one fits which situation.
What the data says about annual and monthly terms
The most useful public dataset is ChartMogul's SaaS Billing Report, which analysed the billing of more than 2,500 SaaS companies using full-year 2024 data. It is not specific to hotel tech, but its findings map closely onto the trade-off hotel software companies face.
Finding | Figure |
|---|---|
Net revenue retention at $250–500 average revenue per account (ARPA) | 88% on annual plans vs 76% on monthly |
Customer retention at under $25 ARPA | 62% annual vs 41% monthly, a 21-point gap |
Customer retention gap at over $100 ARPA | Around 10 percentage points in favour of annual |
Growth of top-quartile companies under $1M ARR with over 75% of revenue on monthly plans | 131% year on year |
Median growth of companies under $1M ARR with 50–75% of revenue on annual plans | 15% |
When monthly customers upgrade to annual | Peaks in month two; January 2024 sign-ups were over 3x more likely to switch in month two than in month nine |
Share of ARR from annual plans at $1K+ ARPA | 55%, against 34% from monthly |
A second analysis, ChartMogul's SaaS Retention Report by Kyle Poyar, reached the same conclusion from a different angle: median net revenue retention is 10 to 20 percentage points higher for annual plans than for monthly ones.
Two caveats. Committed customers self-select into annual terms, so the term is not the only cause of the gap. And hotel software usually sells at a higher price per account than the products behind the low-ARPA figures, so the smaller gaps at higher ARPA are the more relevant ones.
Annual contracts
An annual contract commits the hotel for twelve months, with payment upfront, quarterly, or monthly within the year.
Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Revenue is committed for a year, so forecasting and hiring are easier | Deals take longer because the buyer takes on more risk |
Higher retained revenue: an 88% vs 76% NRR gap at $250–500 ARPA in ChartMogul's data | Owners and general managers may need sign-off they would not need for a monthly cost |
Time to fix a slow start before the customer can leave | Problems stay hidden until renewal, when it is too late to fix them |
Upfront or quarterly payment helps cash flow | Renewal becomes one large decision instead of a steady habit |
Hotel groups and management companies are used to annual terms | Leaning heavily on annual plans early can slow growth, as the 15% median above shows |
The biggest hidden cost of annual terms is that they hide problems. A property that never got started properly will often stay quiet for eleven months and then decline to renew. That is why hotel tech renewals are decided in the first ninety days, not at the renewal meeting. An annual contract gives you time to recover, but only if someone uses that time.
Monthly contracts
A monthly contract lets the hotel cancel with short notice, usually thirty days, and pay as it goes.
Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Lower risk for the buyer, so deals close faster | Revenue can leave in any month, so forecasts are less reliable |
Fits independent hotels with seasonal cash flow | Lower retention: a roughly 10-point customer retention gap at over $100 ARPA |
Problems show up early, while you can still fix them | Implementation cost may not be recovered if the property leaves early |
Linked to faster growth at the early stage in ChartMogul's data | Expansion is harder; reaching 100% NRR on monthly plans was rare outside the top decile |
Good for testing a new segment or product | Seasonal hotels may cancel in the low season and return later, or not |
The risk with monthly terms is that you carry the cost of winning and onboarding the property before it pays you back. If onboarding takes real work, a property that cancels in month three may have cost more than it paid. One answer is to charge separately for implementation, covered in how to price implementation in hotel tech deals, so the monthly fee is not carrying the setup cost alone.
What hotel software vendors publish
Public pricing pages show how established vendors serving independent hotels handle the question. A few examples, as each company states them:
Little Hotelier, which serves properties with 1–30 rooms: Little Hotelier's pricing FAQ says customers can pay month to month with no contract, or pay annually and receive a discount.
SiteMinder: SiteMinder's pricing page describes "no locked-in contracts" and a 14-day free trial for independent properties, while its groups and chains plan is a custom quote.
Cloudbeds: every plan, from Flex to Enterprise, is priced by quote, with custom packages for groups, brands and management companies.
Mews: tiers are priced on request, and the page leads with payback, saying customers can see payback on their investment in as little as seven months.
The pattern: low-commitment monthly terms for small independents, often with an annual discount, and negotiated agreements for groups. Payback framing like Mews' also helps when you ask for a longer commitment, because it answers the buyer's real question: when does this pay for itself?
When each one fits
Situation | Better fit | Why |
|---|---|---|
Independent hotels with seasonal cash flow | Monthly, with an annual discount on offer | Lowers the buying risk; matches what small-property vendors publish |
Hotel groups and management companies | Annual | Matches their procurement process and budget cycle |
Heavy implementation or integration work | Annual, or monthly with a setup fee | You need to recover the onboarding cost |
Light product, live in days | Monthly | Little upfront cost, and a fast sale matters more |
Early stage, still finding fit | Mostly monthly | Linked to faster growth under $1M ARR, and churn teaches you faster |
Proven value with clear results after one cycle | Annual | The buyer has evidence and less reason to hesitate |
Investor or lender scrutiny on committed revenue | Annual | Committed revenue is easier to report and trust |
The middle options
Many hotel software companies end up between the two. These options are worth considering before you choose a side.
Both, priced honestly. Monthly at a higher price, annual at a lower one, as Little Hotelier does. Keep the gap modest so the monthly price stays believable.
Monthly to start, annual offer early. ChartMogul found upgrades peak in month two and stay high through months four and five. Make the annual offer in that window, at a review that shows results, not at month nine.
Annual with an early exit. A twelve-month term with a cancellation right in the first sixty or ninety days if agreed outcomes are not met. It reduces the buyer's risk without giving up the commitment.
Annual commitment, monthly billing. The hotel commits for the year but pays each month, which helps seasonal cash flow while keeping the term.
Group framework, property terms. An annual framework agreement with a group, with properties added on their own start dates.
Be careful with long pilots dressed up as monthly contracts. A month-to-month arrangement with no agreed outcome often drifts the same way a free trial does, and the reasons are set out in why hotel tech pilots rarely convert. Whatever the term, agree what success looks like at the start.
Three questions to decide
How long does a property take to reach first value? If it is longer than a month or two, a monthly term exposes you to churn before the product has had a chance to work, and you miss the month-two upgrade window.
Who signs, and what are they used to? An owner-operator wants low risk. A group procurement team wants a standard annual agreement.
What does your own retention data say? Split retention by billing term and by segment. If monthly customers who reach first value rarely leave, annual terms add little protection. If churn happens after first value, the term is not the problem.
The takeaway
Annual contracts retain more revenue, by 10 to 20 points of net revenue retention in ChartMogul's data, and suit groups, but they slow deals and hide problems until renewal. Monthly contracts lower the buyer's risk, are linked to faster early growth and show problems early, but they make onboarding cost harder to recover. Choose by segment, onboarding effort and your own retention numbers, not by what a rep needs to close this quarter, and agree outcomes whichever term you use.
If deals are stalling over terms, or monthly customers are leaving faster than you can replace them, the cause is usually somewhere earlier in the funnel. A free revenue leak audit shows where.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do hotels prefer annual or monthly software contracts?
Do annual contracts really reduce churn?
Should a hotel tech company offer a discount for annual contracts?
When should you offer monthly customers an annual contract?
Can you offer both annual and monthly options?
Get the latest strategies, trends, and expert advice to help your hotel tech business stay competitive and grow.
Where is your revenue actually leaking?
Twelve questions, about twenty minutes, on your own funnel. The same audit I run on day one of an engagement. No call required.
Get the free leak audit
